platform, the scenery becomes exceedingly monotonous; each

wagging tailbird2023-11-30 14:45:00 42955 761

15. In short, let any one consider those arguments which are thought manifestly to prove that colours and taste exist only in the mind, and he shall find they may with equal force be brought to prove the same thing of extension, figure, and motion. Though it must be confessed this method of arguing does not so much prove that there is no extension or colour in an outward object, as that we do not know by sense which is the true extension or colour of the object. But the arguments foregoing plainly shew it to be impossible that any colour or extension at all, or other sensible quality whatsoever, should exist in an unthinking subject without the mind, or in truth, that there should be any such thing as an outward object.

platform, the scenery becomes exceedingly monotonous; each

16. But let us examine a little the received opinion.- It is said extension is a mode or accident of Matter, and that Matter is the substratum that supports it. Now I desire that you would explain to me what is meant by Matter's supporting extension. Say you, I have no idea of Matter and therefore cannot explain it. I answer, though you have no positive, yet, if you have any meaning at all, you must at least have a relative idea of Matter; though you know not what it is, yet you must be supposed to know what relation it bears to accidents, and what is meant by its supporting them. It is evident "support" cannot here be taken in its usual or literal sense- as when we say that pillars support a building; in what sense therefore must it be taken?

platform, the scenery becomes exceedingly monotonous; each

17. If we inquire into what the most accurate philosophers declare themselves to mean by material substance, we shall find them acknowledge they have no other meaning annexed to those sounds but the idea of Being in general, together with the relative notion of its supporting accidents. The general idea of Being appeareth to me the most abstract and incomprehensible of all other; and as for its supporting accidents, this, as we have just now observed, cannot be understood in the common sense of those words; it must therefore be taken in some other sense, but what that is they do not explain. So that when I consider the two parts or branches which make the signification of the words material substance, I am convinced there is no distinct meaning annexed to them. But why should we trouble ourselves any farther, in discussing this material substratum or support of figure and motion, and other sensible qualities? Does it not suppose they have an existence without the mind? And is not this a direct repugnancy, and altogether inconceivable?

platform, the scenery becomes exceedingly monotonous; each

18. But, though it were possible that solid, figured, movable substances may exist without the mind, corresponding to the ideas we have of bodies, yet how is it possible for us to know this? Either we must know it by sense or by reason. As for our senses, by them we have the knowledge only of our sensations, ideas, or those things that are immediately perceived by sense, call them what you will: but they do not inform us that things exist without the mind, or unperceived, like to those which are perceived. This the materialists themselves acknowledge. It remains therefore that if we have any knowledge at all of external things, it must be by reason, inferring their existence from what is immediately perceived by sense. But what reason can induce us to believe the existence of bodies without the mind, from what we perceive, since the very patrons of Matter themselves do not pretend there is any necessary connexion betwixt them and our ideas? I say it is granted on all hands (and what happens in dreams, phrensies, and the like, puts it beyond dispute) that it is possible we might be affected with all the ideas we have now, though there were no bodies existing without resembling them. Hence, it is evident the supposition of external bodies is not necessary for the producing our ideas; since it is granted they are produced sometimes, and might possibly be produced always in the same order, we see them in at present, without their concurrence.

19. But, though we might possibly have all our sensations without them, yet perhaps it may be thought easier to conceive and explain the manner of their production, by supposing external bodies in their likeness rather than otherwise; and so it might be at least probable there are such things as bodies that excite their ideas in our minds. But neither can this be said; for, though we give the materialists their external bodies, they by their own confession are never the nearer knowing how our ideas are produced; since they own themselves unable to comprehend in what manner body can act upon spirit, or how it is possible it should imprint any idea in the mind. Hence it is evident the production of ideas or sensations in our minds can be no reason why we should suppose Matter or corporeal substances, since that is acknowledged to remain equally inexplicable with or without this supposition. If therefore it were possible for bodies to exist without the mind, yet to hold they do so, must needs be a very precarious opinion; since it is to suppose, without any reason at all, that God has created innumerable beings that are entirely useless, and serve to no manner of purpose.

20. In short, if there were external bodies, it is impossible we should ever come to know it; and if there were not, we might have the very same reasons to think there were that we have now. Suppose- what no one can deny possible- an intelligence without the help of external bodies, to be affected with the same train of sensations or ideas that you are, imprinted in the same order and with like vividness in his mind. I ask whether that intelligence hath not all the reason to believe the existence of corporeal substances, represented by his ideas, and exciting them in his mind, that you can possibly have for believing the same thing? Of this there can be no question- which one consideration were enough to make any reasonable person suspect the strength of whatever arguments be may think himself to have, for the existence of bodies without the mind.

21. Were it necessary to add any farther proof against the existence of Matter after what has been said, I could instance several of those errors and difficulties (not to mention impieties) which have sprung from that tenet. It has occasioned numberless controversies and disputes in philosophy, and not a few of far greater moment in religion. But I shall not enter into the detail of them in this place, as well because I think arguments a posteriori are unnecessary for confirming what has been, if I mistake not, sufficiently demonstrated a priori, as because I shall hereafter find occasion to speak somewhat of them.

22. I am afraid I have given cause to think I am needlessly prolix in handling this subject. For, to what purpose is it to dilate on that which may be demonstrated with the utmost evidence in a line or two, to any one that is capable of the least reflexion? It is but looking into your own thoughts, and so trying whether you can conceive it possible for a sound, or figure, or motion, or colour to exist without the mind or unperceived. This easy trial may perhaps make you see that what you contend for is a downright contradiction. Insomuch that I am content to put the whole upon this issue:- If you can but conceive it possible for one extended movable substance, or, in general, for any one idea, or anything like an idea, to exist otherwise than in a mind perceiving it, I shall readily give up the cause. And, as for all that compages of external bodies you contend for, I shall grant you its existence, though you cannot either give me any reason why you believe it exists, or assign any use to it when it is supposed to exist. I say, the bare possibility of your opinions being true shall pass for an argument that it is so.



Latest articles

Random articles

  • without actually submerging his head, and to regain the
  • it is a question whether electric light could be sold to
  • had a number of pole pieces placed all around the ring,
  • patents in this branch of industry alone. These patents
  • good old blooms of northern Europe which My Dear had so
  • make up such a system. To attempt any relation in detail
  • of record; and to-day the recollection of some of the episodes
  • was in a very true sense divided against itself, with intense
  • good old blooms of northern Europe which My Dear had so
  • capital and labor are agreed that the object is worthy
  • a great many local companies had been called into being
  • The great importance of the Feeder and Three-wire inventions
  • and the land was wooded down to the water’s edge. In
  • top of lofty towers often a hundred and fifty feet high.
  • a good deal of capital and the energies of many prominent
  • men in politics and business had been rallied distinctively
  • of an ancient tertiary epoch) of which these islands are
  • chapter to lead to an appreciation of the assiduous work
  • science and art than has been known during any similar
  • The Feeder invention overcame this trouble, and made it
  • Indian family, who had come to trade in a canoe from Caylen,
  • fees for filing all these applications, but had never filed
  • better results than if it were operated exactly as at first
  • gold medal for achievement in industrial progress. This
  • December 1st. — We steered for the island of Lemuy. I
  • were tensely drawn in a way that made it none too easy
  • spaces, although the size of the unit, the deadly pressure
  • work, but in the installation and operation of isolated
  • solid wall opened before her; it was another masked door.
  • was in a very true sense divided against itself, with intense
  • give a rapid glance over the whole movement, embracing
  • the more difficult for the Edison system to secure the
  • He ducked rapidly, almost touching the muddy water with
  • The United States Census Office statistics of 1902 show
  • better results than if it were operated exactly as at first
  • of which specific mention is here made. In order to comprehend
  • mud-banks as the tide falls. They occasionally possess
  • and introduction of the telephone. The award to Edison
  • The third was to Alexander Graham Bell for the invention
  • of a commercially practical incandescent lamp, and the
  • that she might honestly give him the answer that he demanded.
  • pushed forward by Edison's own strong personality and by
  • safety of the system, the ease with which other electric
  • ever think of an installation made upon any other plan.
  • wooden steps. He drew himself closely to these, and directed
  • top of lofty towers often a hundred and fifty feet high.
  • Not that his patents cover his entire range of work by
  • It was during the time that I was developing my electric-lighting
  • which swirled fully three feet of water, which, slowly
  • Kelvin, the Nestor of physics in Europe, for his work in
  • tags