Eucalyptus family; and with the exception of two or three

wagging taillove2023-11-30 16:14:46 76 168

17. If we inquire into what the most accurate philosophers declare themselves to mean by material substance, we shall find them acknowledge they have no other meaning annexed to those sounds but the idea of Being in general, together with the relative notion of its supporting accidents. The general idea of Being appeareth to me the most abstract and incomprehensible of all other; and as for its supporting accidents, this, as we have just now observed, cannot be understood in the common sense of those words; it must therefore be taken in some other sense, but what that is they do not explain. So that when I consider the two parts or branches which make the signification of the words material substance, I am convinced there is no distinct meaning annexed to them. But why should we trouble ourselves any farther, in discussing this material substratum or support of figure and motion, and other sensible qualities? Does it not suppose they have an existence without the mind? And is not this a direct repugnancy, and altogether inconceivable?

Eucalyptus family; and with the exception of two or three

18. But, though it were possible that solid, figured, movable substances may exist without the mind, corresponding to the ideas we have of bodies, yet how is it possible for us to know this? Either we must know it by sense or by reason. As for our senses, by them we have the knowledge only of our sensations, ideas, or those things that are immediately perceived by sense, call them what you will: but they do not inform us that things exist without the mind, or unperceived, like to those which are perceived. This the materialists themselves acknowledge. It remains therefore that if we have any knowledge at all of external things, it must be by reason, inferring their existence from what is immediately perceived by sense. But what reason can induce us to believe the existence of bodies without the mind, from what we perceive, since the very patrons of Matter themselves do not pretend there is any necessary connexion betwixt them and our ideas? I say it is granted on all hands (and what happens in dreams, phrensies, and the like, puts it beyond dispute) that it is possible we might be affected with all the ideas we have now, though there were no bodies existing without resembling them. Hence, it is evident the supposition of external bodies is not necessary for the producing our ideas; since it is granted they are produced sometimes, and might possibly be produced always in the same order, we see them in at present, without their concurrence.

Eucalyptus family; and with the exception of two or three

19. But, though we might possibly have all our sensations without them, yet perhaps it may be thought easier to conceive and explain the manner of their production, by supposing external bodies in their likeness rather than otherwise; and so it might be at least probable there are such things as bodies that excite their ideas in our minds. But neither can this be said; for, though we give the materialists their external bodies, they by their own confession are never the nearer knowing how our ideas are produced; since they own themselves unable to comprehend in what manner body can act upon spirit, or how it is possible it should imprint any idea in the mind. Hence it is evident the production of ideas or sensations in our minds can be no reason why we should suppose Matter or corporeal substances, since that is acknowledged to remain equally inexplicable with or without this supposition. If therefore it were possible for bodies to exist without the mind, yet to hold they do so, must needs be a very precarious opinion; since it is to suppose, without any reason at all, that God has created innumerable beings that are entirely useless, and serve to no manner of purpose.

Eucalyptus family; and with the exception of two or three

20. In short, if there were external bodies, it is impossible we should ever come to know it; and if there were not, we might have the very same reasons to think there were that we have now. Suppose- what no one can deny possible- an intelligence without the help of external bodies, to be affected with the same train of sensations or ideas that you are, imprinted in the same order and with like vividness in his mind. I ask whether that intelligence hath not all the reason to believe the existence of corporeal substances, represented by his ideas, and exciting them in his mind, that you can possibly have for believing the same thing? Of this there can be no question- which one consideration were enough to make any reasonable person suspect the strength of whatever arguments be may think himself to have, for the existence of bodies without the mind.

21. Were it necessary to add any farther proof against the existence of Matter after what has been said, I could instance several of those errors and difficulties (not to mention impieties) which have sprung from that tenet. It has occasioned numberless controversies and disputes in philosophy, and not a few of far greater moment in religion. But I shall not enter into the detail of them in this place, as well because I think arguments a posteriori are unnecessary for confirming what has been, if I mistake not, sufficiently demonstrated a priori, as because I shall hereafter find occasion to speak somewhat of them.

22. I am afraid I have given cause to think I am needlessly prolix in handling this subject. For, to what purpose is it to dilate on that which may be demonstrated with the utmost evidence in a line or two, to any one that is capable of the least reflexion? It is but looking into your own thoughts, and so trying whether you can conceive it possible for a sound, or figure, or motion, or colour to exist without the mind or unperceived. This easy trial may perhaps make you see that what you contend for is a downright contradiction. Insomuch that I am content to put the whole upon this issue:- If you can but conceive it possible for one extended movable substance, or, in general, for any one idea, or anything like an idea, to exist otherwise than in a mind perceiving it, I shall readily give up the cause. And, as for all that compages of external bodies you contend for, I shall grant you its existence, though you cannot either give me any reason why you believe it exists, or assign any use to it when it is supposed to exist. I say, the bare possibility of your opinions being true shall pass for an argument that it is so.

23. But, say you, surely there is nothing easier than for me to imagine trees, for instance, in a park, or books existing in a closet, and nobody by to perceive them. I answer, you may so, there is no difficulty in it; but what is all this, I beseech you, more than framing in your mind certain ideas which you call books and trees, and the same time omitting to frame the idea of any one that may perceive them? But do not you yourself perceive or think of them all the while? This therefore is nothing to the purpose; it only shews you have the power of imagining or forming ideas in your mind: but it does not shew that you can conceive it possible the objects of your thought may exist without the mind. To make out this, it is necessary that you conceive them existing unconceived or unthought of, which is a manifest repugnancy. When we do our utmost to conceive the existence of external bodies, we are all the while only contemplating our own ideas. But the mind taking no notice of itself, is deluded to think it can and does conceive bodies existing unthought of or without the mind, though at the same time they are apprehended by or exist in itself. A little attention will discover to any one the truth and evidence of what is here said, and make it unnecessary to insist on any other proofs against the existence of material substance.

24. It is very obvious, upon the least inquiry into our thoughts, to know whether it is possible for us to understand what is meant by the absolute existence of sensible objects in themselves, or without the mind. To me it is evident those words mark out either a direct contradiction, or else nothing at all. And to convince others of this, I know no readier or fairer way than to entreat they would calmly attend to their own thoughts; and if by this attention the emptiness or repugnancy of those expressions does appear, surely nothing more is requisite for the conviction. It is on this therefore that I insist, to wit, that the absolute existence of unthinking things are words without a meaning, or which include a contradiction. This is what I repeat and inculcate, and earnestly recommend to the attentive thoughts of the reader.



Latest articles

Random articles

  • his fingers, right and left, and presently found slimy
  • the leaders, but we are also against practising, instead
  • . . . etc. Under this high forehead there was already seething
  • but it seemed that he himself was immune to disease. Nearly
  • fit, often wandering along in the great flower garden that
  • exile! In 1924, the epigones disinterred the letter from
  • work was performed under impossible conditions. It is no
  • me some additional facts. He had just been to see Nadyezhda
  • An instant he hesitated. Through the corridor ahead of
  • were the exception and as such attracted attention; after
  • my trip as extremely dangerous in view of the information
  • matter of where he was to be buried. But the decision of
  • of an ancient tertiary epoch) of which these islands are
  • Alexandrovich Guetier. A good physician and a good man,
  • is, one of warm support and friendly sympathy, but now
  • we’ll try to perform the miracle,” Lenin muttered dryly
  • solid wall opened before her; it was another masked door.
  • In the final reckoning, it is, of course, these latter
  • send Lenin a brief note on a slip of paper. He would answer:
  • England herself could reach such an equilibrium only by
  • man more common interests than the cultured guests of Bwana
  • were not instigated by individuals, as we had at first
  • has gone. Lenin is no more.” The few handwritten pages
  • “Then Vladimir Ilyich has changed his mind?” I asked.
  • up the steps, depositing her there with her back to the
  • told him that he was spending himself on matters of secondary
  • Lenin once compared him to a spirited thoroughbred. Dzerzhinsky
  • if only to a limited degree, turned them into “Trotskyists”
  • unlocked the door at the foot of the steps. He turned,
  • moral power of attorney which Lenin conferred on me, and
  • pamphieteers,’ as he was called by the English author,
  • in front of all the meetings, and a well-organized whistling
  • and one man even sent us a cask of cider as a present.
  • And with emotion I now read Krupskaya’s letter. She took
  • I had seen many Mayday processions that were more imposing
  • from him to the children of the sanitarium at the station
  • damp freshness in the air of the passage, and a sort of
  • were to allow our enemies to shoot down, one by one, the
  • choose paths too roundabout or, on the contrary, to attempt
  • January 27, 1924. Over the palms and the sea reigned silence,
  • event in this quiet retired corner of the world; and nearly
  • and heard about it, he ferociously attacked Molotov —
  • he would say of Stalin. That was why Lenin, at one of the
  • Quite frequently I heard isolated remarks of Kalinin, Voroshilov,
  • In three strides he found his foot splashing in water.
  • The members of the party who raised their voices in protest
  • of the cult of one leader, the cult of others merely of
  • though we agreed to do so and made firm plans for it many
  • Morison had been urging his suit once more that evening,
  • told each other and the patients that the clinic was harboring
  • tags